Yes, it's been over a month, but I have something to show off again. It's another number, but instead of the chances that 1 molecule of DNA will form correctly by chance, it is the chances that 1 molecule of DNA and 1 molecule of RNA will form correctly by chance. It is 1 in:
Remember, this is only 1 molecule of DNA and 1 molecule of RNA, and it does not include the 2000 or more proteins that you would also need. And it's already almost 120000 digits long.
- Truth √
- In a world of selfishness and hidden religions such as "anti-conscientism" and neo-Darwinism, I'm here to speak the truth. I like using my computer, inventing, and researching the next big case made by evolutionists.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Operation Cyclops: Comment 3
"
Just read the review of your book. you are a pitiful and sad person. You need to believe in something other than your own pathetic mind. These ideas are poisoning the youth of today and leading them to suicide and moral depravitude. Anyway, I hope you know God loves you anyway.
"
Dawkins is one of THE most dangerous people in media and education. Personally, I'd rank him right up there with Eugenie Scott and the NCSE. And then again, how could evolution not make someone a pitiful and sad person? Speaking for myself, the idea that my life only lasted 70-80 years or so would start to get to me after a while. And now they're teaching KIDS these things?! Boy, our country has come a long way.
Just read the review of your book. you are a pitiful and sad person. You need to believe in something other than your own pathetic mind. These ideas are poisoning the youth of today and leading them to suicide and moral depravitude. Anyway, I hope you know God loves you anyway.
"
Dawkins is one of THE most dangerous people in media and education. Personally, I'd rank him right up there with Eugenie Scott and the NCSE. And then again, how could evolution not make someone a pitiful and sad person? Speaking for myself, the idea that my life only lasted 70-80 years or so would start to get to me after a while. And now they're teaching KIDS these things?! Boy, our country has come a long way.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Operation Cyclops: Comment 2
Here is the 2nd letter i found in the "Ugly" section:
"Atheism is a religion. You believe in science. You have beliefs. And Dawkins is your God. You have a soul. Scrape that atheist crud off of it and use it to get in touch with God. There is your evidence. You have to find it just like I did. God is within you. Your soul connects you to God!"
This is one of my favorites. How it ever found itself in the "Ugly" category, I don't know. This seems low even for Dawkins.
"Atheism is a religion. You believe in science. You have beliefs. And Dawkins is your God. You have a soul. Scrape that atheist crud off of it and use it to get in touch with God. There is your evidence. You have to find it just like I did. God is within you. Your soul connects you to God!"
This is one of my favorites. How it ever found itself in the "Ugly" category, I don't know. This seems low even for Dawkins.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Operation Cyclops: Comment 1
You wouldn't believe some of the emails I found on RichardDawkins.net. Dawkins labeled them "Ugly," but I found that some of them are very informative. Here is one.
"
Dawkins, you atheist piece of trash. You will twist any truth into athesit propaganda. I am sure this is another distortion of the truth to satisfy your atheist agenda. You may think you are nothing more than just future wormfood but I have life everlasting thanks to the saving grace of Jesus Christ!"
These aren't my words, so they may sound a little "harsh" for this blog, but he's got a good point. Check back tomorrow for another!
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Back to School
Well, summer is ending, and for all you students and teachers out there it means there's alot of homework to do. I am fortunate enough to go to a private school this year, but I still remember going to one that wasn't exactly Christian. Just remember that even teachers can make mistakes, and even textbook writers can misinform you. Make this a year of clear thought and spiritual growth.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
The World Wide Cobwebs: RichardDawkins.net
Click here for site
This one is just wrong. He doesn't submit good science, he has no argument for his harsh criticism toward Christians, he uses somewhat of a "two-party" system (the Bible vs. evolution), and considers religion anti-science. In reality, Benjamin Franklin and James Clerk Maxwell were devout Christians, Einstein was a deist, and Newton believed much of the Bible. They all made some very important discoveries. Even Darwin studied theology for a short time!
And then there are all of the discoveries from the viewpoint that animals were intelligently designed. These include more efficient windmills (based on whales), more efficient swimsuits (whale skin), and the helicopter (dragonflies).The bottom line: Religion supports science; it does not work against it.
This one is just wrong. He doesn't submit good science, he has no argument for his harsh criticism toward Christians, he uses somewhat of a "two-party" system (the Bible vs. evolution), and considers religion anti-science. In reality, Benjamin Franklin and James Clerk Maxwell were devout Christians, Einstein was a deist, and Newton believed much of the Bible. They all made some very important discoveries. Even Darwin studied theology for a short time!
And then there are all of the discoveries from the viewpoint that animals were intelligently designed. These include more efficient windmills (based on whales), more efficient swimsuits (whale skin), and the helicopter (dragonflies).The bottom line: Religion supports science; it does not work against it.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Here's a Little Blog I Wrote ♪
Boy, is it a mess out there. Iran is rioting against their government, We came into a war unconstitutionally and we cannot get out, Israel and Palestine have been fighting for millennia, a man named Hussein is our president, we're spending fortunes on a faulty education system, we''re getting more and more dependent on black stuff that comes from dead trees...
And so the list goes on. I can't speak for you, but I'm going to a place where there's no pain, no disappointment, and probably no public school. (Yay!) The most important thing is not what we take out of the world: We'll die soon anyway. It is not what we leave behind: people won't be around to use it for long. The most important thing is for us to know our place.
I could use just about as many pages as I want proving logically that God exists, and maybe I will someday, but I can't make you believe. Without God, there is nobody to trust, nothing to prove and no reason to try. The choice is yours: You'll have to push the "Print" button yourself.
And so the list goes on. I can't speak for you, but I'm going to a place where there's no pain, no disappointment, and probably no public school. (Yay!) The most important thing is not what we take out of the world: We'll die soon anyway. It is not what we leave behind: people won't be around to use it for long. The most important thing is for us to know our place.
I could use just about as many pages as I want proving logically that God exists, and maybe I will someday, but I can't make you believe. Without God, there is nobody to trust, nothing to prove and no reason to try. The choice is yours: You'll have to push the "Print" button yourself.
I __________name do wilfully and with faith, hope and love, agree to the statement below: "...I consider everything a loss compared to the surpassing greatness of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things. I consider them rubbish, that I may gain Christ..." Philippians 3:8 |
Sunday, May 17, 2009
The World Wide Cobwebs: Evolution.Berkeley.edu
Oh, this is just too good: A 13-year-old at his home computer doubting the claims of Berkeley. The main problem with much of this site is that they use different definitions of evolution. The online Webster dictionary had 10 definitions for evolution, 2 of them as follows:
- a process of change in a certain direction
- a process in which the whole universe is a progression of interrelated phenomena
- A process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage); "the development of his ideas took many years"; "the evolution of Greek civilization"; "the slow development of her skill as a writer".
- The sequence of events involved in the evolutionary development of a species or taxonomic group of organisms.
= 
Friday, May 1, 2009
The World Wide Cobwebs: NotJustATheory.com
First, take a look at the site:
In science, a theory is an idea supported by most of the evidence. However, it is impossible tfor theories to be higher than laws. Look at this diagram:
A > B > C
The ">" symbols only mean that A is a cause of B, which is a cause of C. They are all facts. Therefore, according to notjustatheory.com, C would be a law, and B would be the theory explaining it. However, A would also have to be a theory, and since theories explain laws, B would have to be a law. Therefore, B would have to be a theory and a law, and that does not happen.
The truth is that an idea, as long as it is valid (meaning it is not proven false), it is a theory. If it isc tested and shown to be true, it becomes a law. If it is disproven, it is just false.
In science, a theory is an idea supported by most of the evidence. However, it is impossible tfor theories to be higher than laws. Look at this diagram:
A > B > C
The ">" symbols only mean that A is a cause of B, which is a cause of C. They are all facts. Therefore, according to notjustatheory.com, C would be a law, and B would be the theory explaining it. However, A would also have to be a theory, and since theories explain laws, B would have to be a law. Therefore, B would have to be a theory and a law, and that does not happen.
The truth is that an idea, as long as it is valid (meaning it is not proven false), it is a theory. If it isc tested and shown to be true, it becomes a law. If it is disproven, it is just false.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Knowledge is Power: Restrict It!
Has anyone ever said to you that God cannot be part of science? They say that because you cannot see, smell, taste touch, or hear God, He isn't science. Let me now look at an analogy of atoms: We cannot see, smell, taste touch, or hear atoms, and yet we know that atoms exist. Why? Many experiments have been done that can only be explained if atoms exist. Some of you may want to mention the scanning tunneling microscope as seeing atoms. That can detect atoms by measuring electromagnetism, and it can be very useful, but it is still indirect.
Similarly, we can prove God (or at least a designer) indirectly, just as I did above, and in many other ways too. Check back often!
Similarly, we can prove God (or at least a designer) indirectly, just as I did above, and in many other ways too. Check back often!
Friday, February 20, 2009
Welcome to the Oiligarchy
Have you ever wondered how a perfectly honest politician can turn so selfish? I have. Now, I think I have a bit of an idea.
Play this:
View fullscreen
This^^^ is the situation some CEOs and politicians are in: The money is a millimeter away from them and the "ethics freaks" and the environmentalists are telling them not to. Of course, that isn't an excuse to be selfish.
Play this:
View fullscreen
This^^^ is the situation some CEOs and politicians are in: The money is a millimeter away from them and the "ethics freaks" and the environmentalists are telling them not to. Of course, that isn't an excuse to be selfish.
Saturday, February 7, 2009
The Theory of Deevolution
Hello. Sorry I haven't blogged in awhile, but here it is: More evidence for creation. This is the best kind, because you can usually see it out your window or in your refrigerator:
Diversities among plants and animals.
You may have to do a little thinking for this one. Let's pretend the world was not intelligently designed. Therefore, animals evolved: If they need a longer tongue, they grow a longer tongue, and they survive. If their environment gets too cold, they move, and they survive. See the problem here? They change if their environment cannot suit them. But what about symbiosis? What about animals working together? For example, some small fish go into larger fishes' mouths to look for food. What kind of evolution would compel a fish to go into a bigger fish's mouth to look for food that it could find other places? What would compel that bigger fish, upon discovering a meal in its mouth, not to simply close it and get some food? The food that the smaller fish finds is stuck in the big fish's teeth. The small fish gets a meal and a ride. The big fish gets its teeth cleaned. They could both live without each other, and with evolution, they would.
Diversities among plants and animals.
You may have to do a little thinking for this one. Let's pretend the world was not intelligently designed. Therefore, animals evolved: If they need a longer tongue, they grow a longer tongue, and they survive. If their environment gets too cold, they move, and they survive. See the problem here? They change if their environment cannot suit them. But what about symbiosis? What about animals working together? For example, some small fish go into larger fishes' mouths to look for food. What kind of evolution would compel a fish to go into a bigger fish's mouth to look for food that it could find other places? What would compel that bigger fish, upon discovering a meal in its mouth, not to simply close it and get some food? The food that the smaller fish finds is stuck in the big fish's teeth. The small fish gets a meal and a ride. The big fish gets its teeth cleaned. They could both live without each other, and with evolution, they would.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Disregard the Evidence!
I have some very important news today: The best example I have ever found of relating intelligent design to Christianity.
I hope I have convinced you that many of his claims are not true. If not, I hope to publish some new posts soon that may make some good points. In the meantime, you can check out this site. It is a Christian site, but it has alot of good evidence for both intelligent design and
God.
 ...Nearly half the people in the United States don't believe in evolution. Not just any people but powerful people, people who should know better, people with too much influence over educational policy....We are here talking about the fact of evolution itself, a fact that is proved utterly beyond reasonable doubt. To claim equal time for creation science in biology classes is about as sensible as to claim equal time for the flat-earth theory in astronomy classes....It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)....Ignorance is no crime in a country with strong local traditions of interference in the freedom of biology educators to teach the central theorem of their subject. ...I don't think it is too melodramatic to say that civilization is at war...against religious bigotry. In Britain recently our newspapers have shown crowds of fundamentalists (they happen to be Muslim rather than Christian, but in this context the distinction is of no importance) baying for the death of the distinguished novelist Salman Rushdie, displaying his effigy with its eyes put out and publicly burning his books. The truly appalling thing all such people have in common, whether they are incited to murder by ayatollahs or to less violent observances by television evangelists, is that they know, for certain, that their particular brand of revealed truth is absolute and needs no reasoned defense. In Iran I don't suppose evolution is even an issue, but in the United States a case can be made that it is right there on the front line.  -Richard Dawkins (quote images from richarddawkins.net) |
I hope I have convinced you that many of his claims are not true. If not, I hope to publish some new posts soon that may make some good points. In the meantime, you can check out this site. It is a Christian site, but it has alot of good evidence for both intelligent design and
God.
Friday, January 16, 2009
The Dark Side
Hello, everyone. I think I owe it to myself to have some free time on my blog--from all this Truth√ing--and to you, from reading all about proteins and DNA.
One more thing: I'm not making fun of anyone. Just a little computer design.
One more thing: I'm not making fun of anyone. Just a little computer design.
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Merry Clausmas
Here we go again. It's nearly SantaClausmas again, and it's time to get ready for another season of irrelevant propaganda.
I'm sure some of you have taught your kids about Santa Claus and thought there was nothing wrong with that. But consider this: 80% of a child's brain has developed by age 3. Even after that, they are depending on their parents to teach them what is true and false. Even if you don't believe the Bible, like I do (No fallacies please!), the verse Philippians 4:8 applies here:
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think abut such things."
Not only is that verse true, but we must also teach our children to do the same. Is Santa Claus true? Is the constant pressure to be perfect during the holidays lovely or admirable? Isn't it great that one of the Bible's commands is to think joyous thoughts?
I'm sure some of you have taught your kids about Santa Claus and thought there was nothing wrong with that. But consider this: 80% of a child's brain has developed by age 3. Even after that, they are depending on their parents to teach them what is true and false. Even if you don't believe the Bible, like I do (No fallacies please!), the verse Philippians 4:8 applies here:
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think abut such things."
Not only is that verse true, but we must also teach our children to do the same. Is Santa Claus true? Is the constant pressure to be perfect during the holidays lovely or admirable? Isn't it great that one of the Bible's commands is to think joyous thoughts?
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Small to Big: DNA Weakens Evolution
Good day, everyone. Today, I have a little bit of evidence to share regarding the origin of life. First, I must inform you that all cells carry their genetic code in special molecules called DNA. You should also know that the simplest possible form of life would need at least a molecule of DNA and RNA to live, along with 250 or more complex proteins and many other things. One more thing: Keep in mind that water has a bit of a tendency to dissolve things like DNA, RNA, and proteins, so you would need billions of tons of DNA and RNA, and hundreds of billions of tons of complex proteins, among other components.
Anyway, back to my evidence. I have figured out the chance of ONE DNA molecule--Not a billion tons of molecules, but ONE DNA molecule--forming by chance (no intelligent design). It is 1 in:
NOTE: My original calculation was displayed in the background. It was incorrect.
Anyway, back to my evidence. I have figured out the chance of ONE DNA molecule--Not a billion tons of molecules, but ONE DNA molecule--forming by chance (no intelligent design). It is 1 in:
NOTE: My original calculation was displayed in the background. It was incorrect.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
How to Stop Inflation
Today I have a little intereting news: How to stop inflation.
Yes, you heard right.
We owe trillions of dollars to Japan, China, Vietnam, and everywhere else who sells us products. Let's take a look at how the workers in thos countries are doing compared to us.
Quick question: Have any of you seen this headline on CNN yesterday?
Neither have I. In fact, from what I hear, the Japanese sesem very diligent in their work. But what about the rest of Asia?
In a nutshell, sweatshops are prospering all over China and it's OUR FAULT. We can still buy American products if we lokk hard enough and spend a few extra cents. Those few extra cents will be sucked away anyway, if this inflation keeps coming.
So what causes it? Well, it's a big, long, complicated cycle of ideas, logic, calculus, and emotions called GREED. But interestingly enough, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, John McCain and all of their fellow politicians are at the bottom of the cycle. Thjat doesn't mean their ideas don't matter, but the ones at the top are the workers.
Unlike the Japanese, the Americans are a people to complain--especially when we work. In the typical office, people sit in their little cubicles, take one look at their share of paperwork, and complain.They complain about their pay, their p[aperwork and their benefits. And don't even reind me about our automotive industry. When the workers decide what they want, they'll FIGHT their heads off for it and if they still don't get it they'll go on strike and FIGHT their heads off some more and if they STILL don't get it they'll QUIT their job and go work in an office, thinking everything will be better. If we want to fix our economy, we haveto think about our future, our fellow citizens, and our effect on the economy--consumers as well as workers.
Yes, you heard right.
We owe trillions of dollars to Japan, China, Vietnam, and everywhere else who sells us products. Let's take a look at how the workers in thos countries are doing compared to us.
Quick question: Have any of you seen this headline on CNN yesterday?
Japanese workers form union, owners in need of manpower
Neither have I. In fact, from what I hear, the Japanese sesem very diligent in their work. But what about the rest of Asia?
In a nutshell, sweatshops are prospering all over China and it's OUR FAULT. We can still buy American products if we lokk hard enough and spend a few extra cents. Those few extra cents will be sucked away anyway, if this inflation keeps coming.
So what causes it? Well, it's a big, long, complicated cycle of ideas, logic, calculus, and emotions called GREED. But interestingly enough, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, John McCain and all of their fellow politicians are at the bottom of the cycle. Thjat doesn't mean their ideas don't matter, but the ones at the top are the workers.
Unlike the Japanese, the Americans are a people to complain--especially when we work. In the typical office, people sit in their little cubicles, take one look at their share of paperwork, and complain.They complain about their pay, their p[aperwork and their benefits. And don't even reind me about our automotive industry. When the workers decide what they want, they'll FIGHT their heads off for it and if they still don't get it they'll go on strike and FIGHT their heads off some more and if they STILL don't get it they'll QUIT their job and go work in an office, thinking everything will be better. If we want to fix our economy, we haveto think about our future, our fellow citizens, and our effect on the economy--consumers as well as workers.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Happy Thanksgetting
Today I have a belated message from the people who keep us informed:
(Sorry for the typo.)
OK, I'm sure most people aren't greedy during Thanksgiving. But still, greed and corruptoin diminish about 0% as we move out of the election and into the holidays. Take Christmas, Halloween, and Easter for example. Halloween was when people gave thanks to God for their harvest. Easter was when people celebrated Jesus' resurrection. But then came the beginning of youcanlietoyourkidsaboutanythingism, and with it, the ideas of the Easter Bunny, Scare-your-hairs-off day in October, and, most of all, Santa Claus. Maybe we should start putting Acts & Facts in kids' stockings on Darwin Day.
(Sorry for the typo.)
OK, I'm sure most people aren't greedy during Thanksgiving. But still, greed and corruptoin diminish about 0% as we move out of the election and into the holidays. Take Christmas, Halloween, and Easter for example. Halloween was when people gave thanks to God for their harvest. Easter was when people celebrated Jesus' resurrection. But then came the beginning of youcanlietoyourkidsaboutanythingism, and with it, the ideas of the Easter Bunny, Scare-your-hairs-off day in October, and, most of all, Santa Claus. Maybe we should start putting Acts & Facts in kids' stockings on Darwin Day.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
From Evolution to Atheism
Since I made some distinctions between Intelligent Design, Creationism, and Christianity, it's only fair to analyze the other side as well. There are two commonly generalized terms: Evolution and atheism.
Interestingly enough, some people have been led toward atheism by being taught evolution, and this may have led many people to believe that evolution implies atheism. However, there is still a big difference:
Evolution>>Atheism
To remember this distinction, keep in mind that intelligent design, creationism, and Christianity are all excluded from atheism, but you can believe any or all of them and believe in evolution at the same time.
- Evolution:
This is what they teach you in most science textbooks. This only means that all of the organisms in the world came from a single organism. (If you can ignore the name, Exploring Creation with Physical Science, by Jay L. Wile, is a better textbook that actually provides both sides.) - Atheism:
This is the more specific term, and probably what most secular educators assume you will believe after bombarding you with only evolution. This says that there is NO Christianity, NO creationism, and NO Intelligent Design.
Interestingly enough, some people have been led toward atheism by being taught evolution, and this may have led many people to believe that evolution implies atheism. However, there is still a big difference:
Evolution>>Atheism
To remember this distinction, keep in mind that intelligent design, creationism, and Christianity are all excluded from atheism, but you can believe any or all of them and believe in evolution at the same time.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Don't Kill the Messenger
Today I would like to address the issue of my favorite books and music.
...I heard that! Ok, not really. But just because of what I think DOESN'T mean that my ideas are not useful. It goes something like this: "Martin Luther King's ideas were all wrong. How do I know? Because he was from the minority ethnic group, and his ideas would have benefited him!" Now, maybe not all of you agree with Martin Luther King's ideas, but that i beside the point. If his ideas are wrong, it is not because he is from the minority! If someone from the "dominant" ethnic group came up and said the same things, wouldn't he/she be just as right or wrong as Martn Luther King? Clearly this reasoning is faulty. It is the same in this situation. Just because of how I was raised, what I believe, etc., Not all of my ideas are necessarily wrong.
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Of God and Design
I have recently watched Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed and have one thing to say: It shouldn't be necessary. Ben Stein shouldn't have to be the one to uphold academic freedom in the field of science. That shouldn't be anyone's job. We have brought it on ourselves witth our selfish prejudice and our religion.
If I can have everyone clear out their bias for a moment, I would like to point out the fine lines between Intelligent Design, creationism, and Christianity.
- Intelligent Design is NOT creationism.
Intelligent design is the idea that there was intelligence governing how the universe came to be. Creationism means the idea that a higher being created the universe and that that being should be respected or worshipped.
Don't worry if this is hard to understand. Even I need to think for a second to remember it fully. Nevertheless, the difference is there. - Creationism is NOT Christianity.
We need a more specific term. Buddhism, Hinduism, and even the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" fit into the category of creationism. Christianity, however, is the belief that THE God of the Bible created the universe, and that we rebelled against Him, and that He sent His Son to pay for our sins, and that if we believe all that, then we will be with God forever.
Whew! That last one was pretty hard to distinguish, wouldn't you agree? With a little observation, you will see that these three fall into a specific order, from General to Specific.
Intelligent Design>>Creationism>>Christianity
Now, I'm not saying that any of these are right, and I'm not saying that any of these are wrong. This only means that they cannot be generalized too hastily, and that by questioning neo-Darwinism you by no means proclaim yourself to be a Christian, nor are you magically certified as a radical Republican, nor need you be anything other than one who wants to get all the facts on both sides.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
